Author (and Teacher) Seth Harwood Talks Craft

You may know Seth Harwood as a podcaster and novelist, but you may not know he’s also a creative writing instructor and lecturer at Stanford University. Herewith, Seth answers some questions about craft.


Publetariat: What’s the most common problem or weakness you find in the work of your students?

SH: The first thing that comes to mind is a lack of using scenes.

With a lot of beginning writers, they’re more interested in getting into a character’s head and telling a wide open story than they are in creating specific images and the kind of scenes that a reader can really imagine. One of the things I see that can really help is getting the writer to slow down, to create images and characters on the page that seem three dimensional, that a reader can experience at the same time as he or she is reading. I’m a big fan of the idea that the reader and the writer are co-creators of the story. There has to be room to let the reader’s experiences and imagination in.


P: Many writers struggle with crafting realistic dialogue. Do you have any tips for dealing with this problem?

SH: Yes, again, it comes back to scene and making sure the dialogue exists within one. In my classes we do an exercise around using action and dialogue together. A lot of times dialogue can turn into just two (or more) talking heads: words on the page without bodies in a space saying them. It’s important to keep the characters’ bodies involved in the reading experience.

The other tip I suggest is always reading your dialogue out loud. This can really help catch a lot of "the wood."


P: In educational programs on writing there’s typically an emphasis on literary fiction. Yet your first novel, Jack Wakes Up
, is in the crime/noir genre. Coming out of your MFA program, how did you make that transition?

SH: Well, that’s a great question. I was writing short stories for a long time and love that form. I still love short stories and as a student-writer, I learned so much by working with them. I really got a sense of beginning/middle/end and the composition of a piece that would’ve been very hard to learn if I were just working on novels.

But then as I tried to publish a book, everyone urged me to go out on the market with a novel. "Write your novel," was the advice I kept hearing. So I spent some time working on novels and I was dissatisfied with my first attempts. It wasn’t until I started to introduce more action, comedy and thrilling characters that I really started to feel the sparks and enjoy myself while I was writing. Ultimately, I had to face the fact that I had influences that weren’t just from books: I love movies, TV shows, video games, and I had to let some of that into my writing. When I did that, JACK PALMS CRIME was born!


P: Mainstream publication of short story collections has been on the decline for years but there seems to be a resurgence of the form in ebooks, and in fact you’ll be coming out with Kindle editions of your short story collections on December 27. Are the skills needed to write an effective short story different than those required to write an effective full-length novel? Can working in one form improve one’s work in the other form?

SH: Yes, absolutely. As I said above, I think short stories are a great learning tool, a form you can really cut your teeth on. There’s something so important about being able to start a story, finish a draft, then revise it… and revise it… and… you get the picture. Finally, you can finally call a story done and move on to a new one. There’s something about this process of starting and finishing that I think speeds up the learning process for writing. After all, writing is revising in large part. Because a story is so much smaller, it’s easier to learn revision on them.

And yes, it’s exciting that now I have a chance to do something with my short story collection using ebooks and Amazon’s Kindle platform! For a long time I thought the stories just needed to be shelved because no mainstream publisher would publish them–and this is with twelve of the fifteen stories having been published in literary journals! Now I’m able to bring out the stories myself on Kindle and see if I can get my online audience behind them. We’ll find out on Dec. 27th, when A Long Way from Disney hits Amazon’s Kindle store.


P: Thousands of writers have recently completed draft novels as part of National Novel Writing Month, and many of them are now thinking about next steps, such as workshopping and revision. Do you have any advice on how to approach this stage of the writing process?
 
SH: Yes! First of all, I’d let those NaNoWriMo novels sit for a while. At least a few months. They were written in such a frenzy that it’ll take a while for the dust to settle and the writer to be able to look at the pages for what’s really there–to separate what’s still in his or her head from what’s down on the page. In a few months, it’ll be time to start revising those novels. When that time comes, the best place to start is with a fast read-through of the whole book. Read it and make notes on what’s there as well as what needs to change to make the story the one you really want. It’s a big rush of creativity during NaNoWriMo. Writers have created A LOT of material to work with. Now it’s time to use the revision tools–cutting, rewriting, reshaping–to make that material into your book. Save the polishing for last. Don’t start editing/changing single lines until the last steps.


P: In your upcoming Stanford Online Writer’s Studio class, The Essential Art: Making Movies in Your Reader’s Mind, the focus is primarily on craft but you will also be devoting some time to the current publishing environment and author platform. This is unusual for most creative writing classes and programs. Do you feel these topics should be included in any university-level creative writing program? Why or why not?
 
SH: I think it’s important to include these topics because they lead to writers being enthusiastic. They lead to writer-excitement, which is in small supply these days. I find that when my students start to see ways they can share their work and start generating their own audience–through social networking and free serialized audiobook podcasts–they get very excited about creating new work; they get inspired. I’ve seen this make a great deal of difference in their attitude, approach to the page, and general feelings about writing. So yes, I think it’s important to include.

That said, the main focus of this class is craft: literally showing how to write in such a way that a reader co-creates the narrative in a mental movie as she reads–goes from words on the page to visual characters and scenes in her mind. That’s what we’ll really be building in this class: the tools to take words and turn them into moving images for readers.

 


Seth Harwood received an MFA in fiction from the Iowa Writers’ Workshop. He has taught creative writing at the University of Iowa, UMass Boston, and the City College of San Francisco, and his fiction has appeared in more than a dozen literary and crime/noir journals. His first novel, Jack Wakes Up, which he first serialized as a free audiobook, was published by Three Rivers Press (Random House) and reached #1 in Crime/Mystery and #45 overall in books on Amazon.com on the first day of its print release.

Registration is now open for Seth’s upcoming Stanford Online Writer’s Studio class, The Essential Art: Making Movies in Your Reader’s Mind. The class runs for 10 weeks, from January 11 through March 19.

Excerpt from Christmas Traditions – An Amish Love Story

"If it wasn’t for these ornaments thou gives me each year, the tree wouldn’t look near as pretty," said Luke, bending with his hands on his knees to inspect the presents. "Which one of these presents is the ornament thou brought this year, ain’t?"

"It’s a small package." To look among the pile of presents, she leaned over as far as she could without dragging the popcorn strings on the floor. "I don’t see it under the tree. Either your father left it in the sleigh, or he dropped it in the snow between here and the barn," Margaret dared to say in a scoffing tease, giving Levi a sideways glance.

"That’s the thanks I get for helping thee, is it?" Levi countered back.

He actually smiled at Luke and her. What a switch! Not that Margaret intended to read anything hopeful into his actions. As long as she’d known Levi, she knew he could go from hot to cold in a second. Oh how she wished no matter how slight it might be that Levi would have a change of heart for the better that would last.

She could tell Luke appreciated his father’s placid mood at that moment, too. "It’s fine. I’ll go look in the sleigh. Daed, would thou please put the popcorn strings on the tree for me? Thou are taller. Thou can hang them higher than I can so the strings are evenly spaced. We need to get that done quick. Poor Aunt Margaret’s arms must be tired. She won’t want to stand like that all night." The boy rushed to the kitchen door. He twisted around. "Just don’t start on the ornaments until I get back. I want to be here for that."

"Never would have thought to wait for you if you hadn’t said so," said Margaret with a teasing laugh.

Luke grabbed his coat from the nail by the kitchen door and put it on. He pulled his gray, woolen mittens out of a pocket and yanked them over his hands. He had his hand on the door knob when his grandfather called after him.

"Take the lantern with thee, Luke. It’ll be too dark in the barn to see the sleigh let along a small package in it. While thou is out there check on the cow again. Save me a trip."

"All right, Dawdi," agreed Luke. Lighting the lantern that hung on a nail next to the coats, he held it out in front of him as he went outside.

"You heard your son, Levi. Start draping these popcorn strings over the branches before my arms give out," Margaret dared to order.

"Daed, thou want to help her?" Levi looked at Jeremiah for a way out.

"Ach! I’m too old. I’ll just watch the two of thee have the fun," Jeremiah quipped dryly, stroking his bushy beard.

Finding no way to decline, Levi sauntered across the room to stand beside Margaret. They looked at each other until she broke eye contact when he took an end that dangled from her arm. As his warm fingertips touched her wrist, Margaret’s skin tingled. Her pulse sped up. She flinched and drew her arm back slightly. When she shrank away, his intense gaze flickered over her face before he twisted back to the tree and looped the string over the branches.

"Levi, the boy seems to be happy," Margaret ventured softly, hoping for a break in the chill of resistance she felt radiating from him at having to be so near her.

Lifting the popcorn string up high to drape it over the branches at the top of the tree, Levi answered, "I told thee he was. No need to spoil that. Not if thou cares for him as thee says." Was it possible that Levi’s voice soften? Or, did she just want to believe that. Was she hearing something that wasn’t there?

"I just want to do what’s right," Margaret maintained.

"For who? Luke or thee?" He searched her face as he took the next string from her arms.

Just for a moment, Levi’s eyes seemed warmer somehow, but his words didn’t sit well with Margaret. She glanced across the room at Jeremiah. His eyes closed, the old man’s head relaxed against his rocker. His shallow breathing lead her to think that he’d dozed off.

Just the same, she kept her biting voice low to keep Levi’s father from overhearing. "That’s not fair. If I was thinking about me, I’d impose myself on you more than one time a year to see Luke."

Levi held the popcorn string in mid air, ready to lay it over a bough. He twisted toward her and retorted, "Strong willed as thee are, Margaret, peers to me if thou wanted to have done that, not much way I could have stopped thee. Always thought that lawyer man thou married had more to do with thou not protesting how often thee comes to see Luke than the shunning did."

"Don’t blame this on my husband after all these years. You’re the one who said that once a year was all I could come," insisted Margaret, feeling her efforts to defend herself futile, but she felt the need to try.

"I did say that," Levi agreed vehemently. "That should have been the last time I spoke to thee as long as thee are under the shunning. I had to kneel for confession before the bishops soon after talking to thee to keep from being shunned myself. I confessed to permitting thee to stay here this week in December. Thou could have gone before the bishops also if thee had the desire to lift thy shunning. That would have made things so much easier for both of us." He made a wide scallop of the string over the boughs and turned back to her for another string.

Margaret noticed he purposely didn’t continue with what he had to be thinking. Lifting the shunning also included the fact that she would have to come back to live with the Plain people. That was the only way. Levi knew that wasn’t an option for her because of her marriage to Harry.

When he did finally break his silence it was to rehash their agreement. "If thou recalls, thee is the one who picked the week before Christmas to visit Luke. The day also happens to be Luke’s birthday. Not just one, but two very important days in that little boy’s life that I allowed thee to be here with him." Levi hadn’t mince words. He stooped to drape the last string over some of the tree’s lower branches.

"Luke needs a woman in his life, Levi," Margaret stated quietly to his broad, strong back.

Levi straightened and spun to face her. "Faith gave that right up when the boy was small. As far as Luke knows she died. We are going to keep it that way." His narrowed eyes froze her. "Thou didn’t want the job either as I recall," he said curtly, wanting to make how he felt very clear.

"You never understood." Margaret lowered her gaze. Even if she could get the words out, it was way too late to defend her reasons for giving away Luke. She bit her lower lip to stop it from visibly quivering. She couldn’t cry now. She’d appear weak. The only way to stand up to Levi Yoder was to remain cold and strong just like him. She’d learned that a long time ago. Never give that man the upper hand where Luke was concerned. She wanted the child in her life no matter how short a time she had with him. But she knew if she angered Levi beyond reason, the man was as good as his word. He’d never let her see her son again.

Levi glanced toward the kitchen. "Seems like it’s taking my son too long to find that ornament. It’s cold out there. I should go help him. Maybe something’s happened with the cow." He started toward the kitchen.

 

 

Margaret thought, feeling let down because Levi had tried to put a damper on her pleasant evening. Levi speaks bluntly and runs away.

 

                                                        Chapter 5

Levi paused with a hand on the door facing and stared into the dark kitchen. He whirled around. With his head slanted to one side, he studied Margaret. "Tell me the truth for once. Why didn’t thy husband come with thee this time?"

Margaret didn’t know how much longer she could hold up under Levi’s probing. She wished he’d just leave the subject of Harry alone. She gazed at the floor while she rubbed the prickly feeling away in her left arm caused from holding it out straight so long. She always felt as if Levi could read her mind. He certainly could tell if she chose to lie to him. In a barely audible voice, she broke the vow of silence she’d made to herself on the trip out from town. She blurted out, "Harry left me."

"Did he?" Surprise was in his voice. "The lawyer man did know the truth?" Again Levi’s slanted eyes raked over her face as he questioned her, trying to read her mind before she answered him.

She hated that Levi kept pushing. If being truthful was what he wanted, she’d be truthful since he asked. Maybe he would ease up on the way he treated her if he knew the truth.

"Not until a few days ago," she admitted.

Levi pounced in front of her. He poked his finger under her chin and raised her head so she had to look at him. Gazing down at her, he asked incredulously, "Maggie, thou never told him before this?"

Out of words, Margaret shoved his hand away and lowered her head. She nodded no slowly, contemplating the one word she’d just heard that surprised her. In the midst of this heated discussion, Levi called her Maggie. The mention of that long ago term of endearment was a reminder of happy times in her youth. For many years now, Levi hadn’t used the nickname when he spoke to her. She had always felt lucky if he managed to call her Margaret Goodman. But now that he was so worked up, he didn’t seem to realize he’d called her by her nickname. Strange what it took to rattle this man. He remained cold and distant or angry when discussing his son with her but seemed on the edge of exploding when he talked about her husband.

Levi grabbed her by the shoulders and shook her as if that would dislodge her answer. "Why not?"

"Because I knew Harry finding out about you and me would hurt him. I feared he’d leave me," Margaret stated flatly, pulling away from his rough grip.

"Ach! Why tell him now then?" Levi said with a frustrated sigh. "If thou thought that, just leave the truth hidden. The fewer Englishers who know the better. Burn thy sister’s devil book and let well enough alone."

Margaret’s admission came painfully slow, because she knew it would only infuriate Levi further. "Because I promised Faith I’d give Luke the journal this year. If Luke was to know the truth now, I had to tell Harry first. Eventually, you know very well my husband would have found out somehow if I hadn’t. To find out from someone else wasn’t fair to him. It would have hurt Harry much more than my telling him."

"Is what’s in that journal thy only reason for telling Harry Goodman?" Levi asked, searching her face as though he expected more.

She didn’t understand. "What other reason would I have?"

Levi stared at her. His unwavering eyes filled with sadness. "Thou should have stayed home with thy husband this time. If thou had kept silent, his leaving thee would never have to be. Now what are thou going to do when thee leaves here?" Levi’s voice held a note of concern. In his eyes was tenderness. His face soften while he waited for her reply.

Or was she imagining his feelings toward her changed. She’d wished for that to happen for so long. Her resolve to be cold and defiant melted away. She wasn’t used to this type of emotion from him. He hadn’t displayed a hint of gentle feelings toward her in years.

Margaret sighed deeply. "Perhaps you’re right about me not giving Luke the journal. He’s well and happy with the way he believes things to be. After all these years, surely Faith is gone for good. What difference could it make to her now if I didn’t carry out her wishes if that’s the way you want it. I’ll give what you say some thought in the next few days. As for me, you needn’t worry. Harry gave me the house so I have a place to live. He’s using the time I’m here to move his things out." She sighed again. "The worst part will be trying to explain to the busy bodies in town why my husband left me. They’ll notice sooner or later."

"Don’t try to explain. Tell them it’s none of their business. Or better yet just ignore them," Levi said, his tone soft and husky.

"If only that would work," she said, doubtfully.

Suddenly, Margaret felt so very weary from the weight of her world being turned upside down. One thing she was certain of, she could only blame herself for what had happened to her

recently. Her sister, Faith, wasn’t there to blame for her misfortune this time. She sagged closer to Levi. He placed his hands gently on top her shoulders. His gaze didn’t budge from her face as he slid his hands until he touched her throat. With his thumbs, he caressed her neck. Mesmerized by his gaze and touch, Margaret felt helpless to pull back even if she had wanted to. Her pulse pounded under his thumbs. Levi lowered his head close to hers. He tucked a finger under her chin to lift her head up. She held her breath, daring to hope that Levi intended to kiss her.

"Oh, Maggie, —-," he whispered.

At the sound of Luke’s footsteps in the kitchen, Levi dropped his hands to his side. The boy watched his father glide away from Margaret. Luke paused in the doorway. Fearing tension between Levi and Margaret, the child hesitated in the door. He’d been raised with the belief that harsh words and raised voices were a forbidden sin. Margaret knew the only time heated moments occurred around Luke was when she visited. She saw the alarm on the child’s face. She hated what Levi and she did to him. They continually tugged that little boy back and forth between them like a piece of pulled, molasses candy.

Luke looked from his father to his aunt and back. In one hand, he held a small, snow covered package. In the other, he grasped a black book bound with twine.

Margaret’s breath caught.

Levi let out a low groan.

"The journal must have slid out from under the sleigh seat where I hid it," whispered Margaret out of the corner of her mouth to Levi. "He mustn’t read it yet."

"Come on in and warm up, son. Cold out there tonight, ain’t?" Levi invited, holding his hand out to encourage his son to enter the room.

 

Always the same pattern,

Is It Time To Kill 'Jerry'?

In 2000, screenwriter John Blumenthal self-published his comic novel, What’s Wrong With Dorfman? after his manuscript had been rejected 75 times. (You know, I have to admire a writer who believes in their book that much. I’m not sure how anxious I would be to resubmit my book after 30, 40, or 50 rejections.)

In any event, people kept telling Blumenthal how much they loved the book, even though they were rejecting it for publication. So he decided to take matters into his own hands, set up a publishing company, and self-published his book.

 A Self-Publishing Success

Dorfman was selected by January magazine as one of the 50 best books of the year. Blumenthal went on to get other major reviews and eventually sold the book to St. Martin’s Press.

Blumenthal has also published with Simon & Schuster and Ballentine. He sold over 4,000 copies of his self-published What’s Wrong With Dorfman? by working relentlessly at promotion. But he realized his company, Farmer Street Press, would need someone to play the role of publisher. That’s how “Jerry” was born.

As he said in BooksnBytes.com,

There was no Jerry. Jerry was me. Every self-publisher should have a Jerry, although you can call him Bob or Moishe or Deepak, it’s up to you. Jerry was the front man. He put his name on press releases etc. I wanted people to think Farmer Street Press was a real company. Unfortunately, I had to fire Jerry because we just didn’t see eye to eye on a lot of things.

“Jerry” Has Plenty of Ancestors

Before so many people jumped into self-publishing, we tried mightily to disguise what we were doing. Somehow a publishing company run by John Smith (for example), publishing a book by John Smith, publicized by a PR person named John Smith does not, perhaps, convey the best message to those you are trying to sell to. Or at least that’s what we thought.

One of my publishing mentors, Felix Morrow, created the Mystic Arts Book Society, an early negative-option book club. He had to have a monthly magazine in which the editor picked the books for the month and wrote them up for the membership.

Felix realized that among the many new books he would be promoting through his book club, there would be some he couldn’t sell himself. Felix had a long history as a writer and publisher and some of the subjects Mystic Arts dealt in were considered to be “fringe” or “alternative” or “counterculture” at the time.

His solution: he created an editor for his book club, John Wilson, who was really Felix’s alter ego. As John Wilson he could find books for his members and had complete freedom to write the copy he needed for his monthly newsletter.

As Felix would say, when we talked about the possibility of duplicating his book club in the 1990s, “I needed John Wilson. He could say things that Felix Morrow could never say!”

Time to Kill Them Off?

We’ve entered a whole new world when it comes to self-publishing and independent publishing. Like musicians a few years ago, it’s now seen as useful, almost obligatory, for authors to have direct contact with their readers, and we are constantly being bombarded by advice to “build our author platform” and “dialogue with readers” to establish a “community of interest” around the books we write and publish.

In this new model, it’s authenticity that counts. We have authors blogging about their creative process, about their editorial progress, about how much money they are making from the sales of their books.

On Twitter we can follow our favorite authors and interact with them in ways we never could have imagined a few years ago.

With this wave of contact, communication and authenticity, do we really need the “Jerrys” and the “John Wilsons” of the past? Authors now establish publishing companies, hire editors, designers and book printers, and proudly declare themselves author/businesspeople in the marketplace.

It could be time to kill these guys off. What do you think? Do we still need to keep up the artifice, to pretend we are really a small publisher, not a guy in the dining room with a laptop? Would it matter any more? Leave me a comment and let me know what you think.

This is a cross-posting from Joel Friedlander’s The Book Designer site.

Leave No Stone Unturned – Sell Thru All Channels

I have talked about the competitiveness of the book industry. Last year there were over 275,000 new books published. At the same time, there are fewer bookstores. If you don’t understand why, go watch the popular video You’ve Got Mail to see a very realistic scenario. So, what to do?

It is imperative to sell your books in as many channels as possible. OK, that’s Marketing Speak—translation—sell your books to as many places as you can in as many forms as you can. Let’s take a look at these:

  • Traditional distributors & Giant Chains
  • Bookstores
  • Libraries
  • Nontraditional outlets
  • Direct sales of printed books
  • Direct sales & distributor sales of Ebooks
  • Direct sales & distributor sales of Audio books

Traditional Distributors & Giant Chains

These include selling with the help of a wholesaler such as Ingram, Baker & Taylor, and smaller independent distributors, as well as Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Borders, etc. These are the height of competitive channels; however, they are necessary. They are also not very lucrative, since you have to give 55 to 65% discounts to these entities. With the cost of production, that doesn’t leave much for the publisher. Still, you need to use them because of their established inroads into the bookselling community.

Bookstores

They are harder to reach because there are fewer of them—both major chains and independents—and because they are overwhelmed by the book offers they receive. Still, they must be approached.

Libraries

This market has shrunk somewhat due to shrinking book buying budgets. They also prefer getting books from well established library distributors that add in little benefits such as paper pockets for date-due-by cards and such. If you believe your book will have an appeal to this market, I would highly encourage you to include the Library of Congress registration data on the copyright page.

Nontraditional outlets

This can be a lucrative market if done right. One of the chief benefits is no returns. Retailers other than bookstores just aren’t used to doing that. If your book, nonfiction or fiction has a specialty theme in it, this is a viable market for you. For example: you’ve written a guidebook to bike trails in your community. Bicycle shops are far more likely to sell your book steadily because that’s where your market segment can be found. It can work for fiction as well. If you’ve written a good action novel about bike racing or touring, bicycle shops are a great place to sell it. This is one example, so use your imagination to consider other places. Let’s say you’ve written a series of mysteries built around quilting (sound familiar?) Quilting stores and even craft supply stores would be natural venues for your books.

Direct sales of printed books

This worked well for me during the 1990’s when I had my own publishing company. In addition to fulfilling orders for my own products, I added about 200 products from other publishers in a direct mail catalog. I had 8,000 customers and did a third again more business from the basement of our home than I did from our bookstore downtown. Today, we have the internet in addition to the postal system, which is a whole new world.

Direct sales & distributor sales of Ebooks

A pdf version of your book and cover isn’t that hard to produce and sell over the internet as an ebook. It should sell for about 50% of what your printed version’s retail price is; however, it’s all pure bottom line territory. If you want to make multiple format versions for Kindle, etc., you can buy the software to do that or you can use a distributor such as Smashwords.com who will put your book into multiple versions and sell it through many channels for only 15% of the retail price. To me, that is a good deal and well worth considering.

Direct sales & distributor sales of Audio books

Finally, there are audio books. These can be as technically difficult to produce and certainly more expensive than printed versions. This is why audio books generally more expensive than printed versions. Traditionally one would use skilled readers (usually out of work actors) in an expensive recording studio. Then there are the expenses of pressing CDs and designing their labels and container covers, which are every bit as expensive as book covers and even more so if multiple pages are required. But I have found a wonderfully cost effectively way to do this—Hudson Audio Publishing. They do have an acceptance committee, so if your book doesn’t cut it, you won’t be able to go thru them; however, their up front production costs are minimal and are paid primarily from royalties. You can record your own right at your PC or Mac or you can use free lance voice over experts they can recommend. They charge 30% (for a $10 book, you keep $7) of the retail price to sell your book through established audio book markets as downloads. This is the audio version of an ebook. They pay royalties every 90 days. You can find them at http://www.hudsonaudiopublishing.com/.

Bottom Line

You cannot afford to not consider all of the above in today’s competitive market place. The more venues you use, the more formats you use, the more credible you become. You’ve got to be a player if you expect to quit your day job (oh no, not yet!). Now go out there and make your presence felt.

 

This is a cross-posting from Bob Spear’s Book Trends Blog.

The Inconvenient Truth about Voice

This post, from Dan Holloway, originally appeared on the Year Zero Writers’ Collective site on 12/5/09 and is reprinted here in its entirety with his permission.

(with thanks to @cinemamanche for his lovely description of voice as the aroma of a text)

Voice is one of the great mysteries of writing, and the bearer of a couple of inconvenient truths for any author. It’s the one thing you can’t do without; but no one will tell you how to get better at it.

So what is voice?

Put it like this. What do Stanley Kubrick, Radiohead, DBC Pierre, Frank Gehry, Bob Dylan, Elfriede Jelinek, Morissey, Anish Kapoor, and the Coen Brothers have in common? Apart from that night ten years ago, outside the Brixton Academy, when… The answer is obvious – and it should end the topic right there. But somehow it never does. What I want to do with this article is figure out why an article like this needs to be so long.

The answer , in case it’s not self-evident (or in case there really was a night 10 years ago…), is that most people with a basic knowledge of the field in question – be it film, music, literature, architecture or art – if shown a piece of hitherto unseen work by one of them, would instantly be able to tell you who’d made it. And that, in fewer than 200 words, is all there really is to say about “voice”.

And yet we keep talking about it. Everywhere writers meet there is almost as much hot air and verbiage about voice as there is jealous bile about the latest vampire hit. Why? Simple, really. Editors, agents, publishers. They all agree on this one (and possibly only) point – voice is the essential ingredient a writer must possess. The “experts” also seem to agree on one other point – that of the key elements of writing – including characterisation, pacing, plotting – the one that can’t be taught is voice.

I want to look briefly at why It is that these two things make voice so controversial, and then ask the questions – is voice really essential? Where does it come from? What do we mean by saying it can’t be taught?

It’s obvious why saying voice is the one essential quality for a writer should make it controversial, especially when “experts” seem to go out of their way to be obfuscatory about what they mean by it. It’s true that in much genre fiction voice is slightly different, because there are genre norms, and what is valued most is often that elusive quality of “transparency” – an author who doesn’t intrude on their world. But I don’t want to get too het up on that distinction because if one does it can become an excuse for “literary” authors like us here to start sticking their nose into their text and, unless you’re making a point of that a la Kundera, it’s no more acceptable here than in genre fiction. A novel should (Ooh, I used the “s” would – spank me), even if it’s cross-referential, be a self-contained world in which the reader can lose themselves.

“Voice can’t be taught.” Publishers, agents, and editors seem, in my experience, to say this in the sense of “if someone comes to us and they can’t plot very well we can, and will, work with them on it. But if they have no voice, there’s nowt we can do.” There’s a very obvious reason why this is controversial, and it has to do, I’m afraid, with political correctness. I had a girlfriend once who took (more than) umbrage at my supervisor’s assertion that first class academic work could not be quantified but was evident when he was faced with it. Her complaint, that it wasn’t fair because it gave people nothing to aim for, that it discriminated against the hard-working and perpetuated an elite, was understandable. The need for fairness is one of our deepest yearnings.

But in this case, I’m afraid the complaint is utterly irrelevant. Artistic merit is nothing about rewarding hard work. It’s about, well, artistic merit. And that, I’m afraid, is unquantifiable but evident when you’re confronted with it. Which means that the thousands of writers who “write beautifully”(how often on sites like Authonomy do we hear reviewers say “this is beautifully written it should be published”?) are naturally going to feel aggrieved, but their beautiful writing is, frankly, very little to do with the artistic value of their book. If it was, the Tate would be full of Royal Doulton special edition plates.

So that’s why voice is controversial. But hang on. There’s a deeper question. Are people right that it matters at all? Well, it sounds like a dogma, and dogmas are things we at Year Zero dislike, er, dogmatically. And to an extent it IS nonsense. The value of much art lies in what it does for the people and communities that produce it – it gives hope, aspiration, self-esteem, vision – a sense of future, and to be honest, no aesthetic bollocks I spout in the next 500 words is going to trump that. As a punk ideologist and humanist, voice means precisely bugger all in art.

Except. Well, except look at those things – self-esteem, hope, vision. What do they mean? How are they real to an individual unless those hopes are specific? Unless the art produced has meaning to the community/individual? And a lot of that is about distinctive voice. So there IS, kind of, a crossover with “art for art’s sake”. And so there ought to be, because we’re not JUST absinthe drinking dilettantes.

Nonetheless, I’m part of Year Zero because I DO care about the arty nonsense. I want my writing to be the best it can. I want to push boundaries, connect with readers in unique ways, produce a body of work that (a subject for another blog) “matters”. And that means I need voice.

Which brings me to how to develop voice if it really is unteachable, and how to know if I have it because, if I don’t, I might as well leave the Zeroes now.

I want to start with Malcolm Gladwell’s oft-cited rule of 10,000 hours. His work on this is really at the heart of all the “learn the rules to break them” vs natural genius debates. He showed that most of the people we think of as geniuses – in the arts and in sport – actually did nothing of any real brilliance or originality until they’d put in 10,000 hours of practice.

What does this mean? Well, it means the “I don’t need rules, I’m a genius” brigade really are, as we thought all along, just lazy and will probably never produce anything any good. It also means something very useful. It means, if I understand correctly, that a natural aptitude for following the rules well is a good indicator that you may at a future stage develop an original voice. So that “beautifully-written” prose isn’t valueless. But it’s an indicator of what might be to come and not of the work in which it is displayed.

So what, practically, does that mean? Well, it means it’s a great thing to experiment. Which we kind of knew already. Why does it mean that? Well, first because it will accelerate the progress through your apprenticeship (question: why, when we hire a plumber, or go to a doctor, do we consider it essential they have served a full apprenticeship but as writers we expect to have a hit with our first novel?). If you spend them all on just one area of writing, it’s unlikely you’ll emerge fully formed. It’s also important that you find what suits you, pick up new tricks, borrow from here, pastiche from there until slowly something begins to emerge that’s you.

So it turns out there are not two but three inconvenient truths about voice. It IS essential. And it IS something that’s unquantifiable and unteachable in itself. he good news is that one can work on it, practising the basics until one’s voice emerges. The third inconvenient truth is that the practice will take a lot of time and angst and sweat and pain. Just like anything else worth doing.

Do discuss at will and leisure – I’d also like to hear your examples of great, original voices – in any form of the arts.

[Publetariat Editor’s note: you may prefer to join the discussion over on the Year Zero site, where Dan and the Year Zero community will be sure to see your remarks, rather than commenting here on Publetariat]

The Trunk

When it comes to infidelity, experts always say it’s just a symptom of an underlying problem and the blame must be shared between the cheater and the betrayed.

In this case, Charlotte was pretty sure the blame was all Tim’s.

“Goddamn it, Charlotte,” he rasped, “We’ve been going around and around on this thing for…” he checked his watch and his shoulders drooped. “Nearly five hours now. I’ll do whatever you want, I’ll say whatever you want, but this has to end.”

“You’re a selfish bastard.”

“Absolutely.”

“And I can’t trust you anymore.

“I don’t expect you to. I know I don’t deserve it. Check my email, voicemail, call logs, credit card bills…whatever you want. For as long as you want. Hire a private eye to follow me around. Cancel my Twitter account. I’m willing to do whatever it takes to make this right. Nothing is off-limits.”

Her reddened eyes darted from Tim to the walk-in closet. She knew this might be her only chance.  “Nothing?

His head jerked around. Oh, no. The Trunk. She was after The Trunk. His exhausted mind scrambled, came up with nothing. And still, words tumbled out.

“It’s mostly just Playboys, you know. I mean, it’s not like there’s…” His brain finally perked up enough to make him wonder where the hell he was going with this, but not enough to shut him up. “…a live girl in there or anything.”

Charlotte’s mouth dropped open. Without another word, she stormed into the closet.  

Tim followed, still stupid with fatigue. “Just the classic ones, then. At least let me keep them long enough to sell them online. You could use the money to buy something for you.”

Standing in front of The Trunk, she wheeled on him and bellowed, “I don’t want your porn proceeds! What would I tell Lynne and Shari? These are the diamond earrings that Barely Legal bought?! Thank God for my husband’s Girls Gone Crazy subscription; if he’d had just a few more months’ worth, I could’ve gotten the matching necklace?!”

She bent down to grab one of the handles and yanked. The Trunk didn’t budge. She rolled her eyes up at Tim, who tried to look surprised.

It's Hard Out There For Everyone

This post, from Henry Baum, originally appeared on The Self-Publishing Review on 12/3/09 and is reprinted here in its entirety with his permission.

One thing that is lost in the self-publishing/traditional publishing debate is just how hard it is to sell any kind of book.  It’s as if pointing out that it’s difficult to sell self-published books, it implies it’s easy to sell traditionally-published books.  It’s not – it’s hard to sell everything.  One of the criticisms of self-publishing is people saying, “But self-publishers need to market all the time! When is there time to write???”  Unless you’re Dan Brown, or some other high-profile writer, most writers have to spend a whole lot of time marketing.

This could be an argument against self-publishing: if it’s so hard to sell a traditionally published book, why even bother self-publishing, as it’s a potentially futile exercise. You won’t get a lot of argument from me there: it’s true, selling self-published books is hard. But so is getting traditionally published – precisely because it’s so hard to sell books, they look more towards those books that are more likely to sell more easily.

What it comes down to, though, is that we’re all in the same boat.  This whole debate should be us vs. them, but how in the hell can we get people to read more. A post at Digital Book World about the Rick Moody Twitter experiment (he posted a story in installments on Twitter) is particularly telling about how hard it is for all publishers and bookstore owners, not just us lowly self-publishers. The post links to another post by the manager of Vroman’s bookstore where he says:

The Moody Twitter experiment (and Moody wasn’t to blame for its failure, though I’m sure the first couple comments will be “ZOMG!1! Rick Moody is teh suck!1!!1?) depressed me for a number of reasons.  First, it made me wonder what we’re all doing on Twitter.  If so many of my followers are book industry people, am I wasting my time with it?  All this time, I’d hoped I was reaching customers.  To be sure, Twitter is useful for talking to colleagues in the book industry, and I’ll continue to use it for that purpose, but if it doesn’t have a reach beyond that, I’m not sure what the point is.  So much of the dialog that happens on Twitter and on the literary blogs feels masturbatory to me.  It’s the same couple hundred people talking about the same issues to the same audience.  Is that what I’ve been doing these past few years?  Is that what the book business is at this point?  If it is, then to quote the modern day philosopher Bunk Moreland “We ain’t about much.”

The book business is in major decline, and while we can all howl about the reasons why, the main one, it seems to me, is that not enough people read (and those who do, read less than they used to).  There are more ways than ever to get your entertainment and information, and books are having a lot of trouble keeping up.  Those of us who rely on selling books for a living need to devote a lot of time to finding people who are not readers.  We have to grow our market, or we are in for a very dark future indeed.   The reaction to this Twitter experiment seems to indicate to me that we’re not all that interested in doing it.  Or maybe we are, as long as it doesn’t interrupt our conversations about ebook formatting and the National Book Awards.

In other words, those at the top of the literary food chain – a major retailer like Vroman’s, where a self-publisher might dream of a book being housed – are having as much trouble unloading books as self-publishers themselves.  And just like a site like this might be an echo chamber of self-publishers reading about other self-publishers and possibly not buying anything, the same thing is occurring for everyone.

Which is one reason why the traditional publishing vs. self-publishing debate is so stupid.  We’re all trying to get people to buy our books.  There’s a lot traditionally published writers and sellers can learn from the sometimes-innovative approaches of self-publishers and vice versa.  Reading is on decline just as – somehow – there are more books being produced than ever.  I guess writers aren’t very voracious book buyers.  But basically, we’re all trying to reach readers in our own way in a very difficult environment, so criticizing self-publishing as the means of production should be the least of people’s worries – it should moreso be about how to make reading attractive to a new generation of readers.

Some might say that self-publishing dilutes the field even further by introducing books to people that should never be read and so turn them off of reading.  Possibly – but on the flipside, the possibility of being able to publish your own book could also make reading and writing more attractive to a new generation of readers. To me, that outweighs the former by a lot.

I read recently (can’t remember where) that McSweeney’s considers it a success to sell 3000 books of an edition.  McSWEENEY’S – a publisher that can get books reviewed most anywhere and has a huge built-in fan base.  That should tell you the state of bookselling.  The problem isn’t that it’s hard to sell self-published books.  The problem is that it’s hard to sell books.  Period.

[Publetariat Editor’s note: the quote to which Baum refers is probably this one, from Dave Eggers in an interview with Mother Jones from April of this year, discussing the Voice of Witness book series (published by McSweeney’s): "Small readerships can support small presses, definitely. If we sell 3,000 copies of a VOW book, for example, we’re in pretty good shape; we will have paid for the book’s expenses. But generally, we do try to keep expenses low, and operate more as a co-op than anything else."]

THE DIY AUTHOR RETURNETH (AGAIN) What To Do When the Mainstream Yawns: Pt 3

This post, from Pat Holt, originally appeared on her Holt Uncensored blog on 11/30/09 and is reprinted here in its entirety with her permission. You can read part one of the series here, and part two here.

I never thought I’d see this in my lifetime: Unpublished authors so smart and so quick on the Internet that they’re selling their work through iPhones apps, iTunes and eBook readers without going through that cranky old sluggish machine called mainstream publishing.

 

Here’s  author Seth Harwood (see last two columns below), who recently attended Bouchercon, the mystery writers’ conference, and sent this dispatch:Seth Harwood

 

The New Thing

 

“The new thing  seems to be authors putting their unpublished works out on Kindle themselves and selling each title for .99 or $1.99, of which they keep 35 or 70 cents respectively.

 

“The idea is that you can get new Kindle owners to stock up on cheap titles to fill their device when they get it. A few authors have sold upwards of 4,000 copies of unknown books and are using that launching pad to get bigger deals from publishers. Who knows how many of those buyers actually read the book.

 

“Of course, there are still roughly 40 times more iPhones and iPod Touches out there sold than Kindles, so the biggest action among individual authors lies in getting their books sold through Apps at equally low prices.”

 

 

The Old Thing Reacts

 

I must say I wouldn’t have believed that people who love books would buy titles based on price rather than quality if I hadn’t found myself in the freebie sections of Audible.com and iPhones for months now or warmed to the notion of trying short stories for 45 cents and why-not-take-a-flyer thrillers by unknowns for .99 to $1.99.

 

(And just to show you those free first-chapter offers can stimulate sales, my apologies to psychologist/author Wayne Dyer for smirking when I saw the title of  his new book, “Excuses Begone! How to Change Lifelong, Self-Defeating Thinking Habits” from Hay House (288 pages, $24.95). I used to think Dyer has been writing the same self-help book for the last dozen titles, but solid research and reference to a fresh plan of action in Audible’s free Chapter One convinced me to buy the damn thing.)

 

It’s not that any of these electronic versions replaces traditional books (and let’s stop talking as though they do; we won’t know for a long time). What we see now is new access to the printed word and new ways to build the reading audiences for books in every form possible. (For example, I’m hardly alone when word of a new book arrives  via the Internet and I call my local independent bookstore to get a copy.)

 

 

The New, New Way

 

You can see how profits may be surprisingly good for mid-range authors who skip the publishing route and go directly to e-Books themselves by checking out Joe Konrath’s incredible story at his website, “A Newbie’s Guide to Publishing.”

 

Joe KonrathHere is an established writer with a series of Jacquelin (of course her nickname is Jack) Daniels detective novels at Hyperion making more money on the Internet with his unpublished works than Hyperion (chained to the list price) can bring him through its own Internet distribution channels.

 

 For example, Konrath compares income from five of his titles published by Hyperion, which sold through Kindle at prices ranging from $3.96 to $7.99; and four self-published titles he sold himself through Kindle at $1.99.

 

 Although the self-published titles sold at far reduced prices than those from Hyperion, the difference in sales was nearly 1 to 9 (Hyperion to self-published). His cut for the self-published books was bigger, too, so at the end of six months his income from the two sources looked like this:

 

 

4 Hyperion titles sold through Kindle: $2008

5 self-publihsed titles sold through Kindle: $6860

 

It’s not a lot of dough, but if Konrath’s detective novels continue to sell at the fast clip he thinks they will, and if Ebook sales increase (”I’m 100% sure Ebook sales are going up,” he writes) in all electronic readers (Sony, etc.), he calculates that “by the end of 2010 I can make $5000 per year per Ebook title by self publishing. I can easily write four books per year.”

 

Plus, he can write many more than that and could end up making $70,000 a year because the Ebook demand is building so fast. (He’s even going to put “The Newbie’s Guide to Publishing” as an Ebook on Kindle.)

 

 

The Big Reverse

 

I think of this as another cycle of the old pulps, in a way. Just as people used to pay 25 cents for a Pocket Book detective novel off the spin rack and not worry about quality, today we can do the same with 99-cent novels and check out new voices  without much risk.

 

This leads  the new breed of authors like Seth Harwood and Joe Konrath to believe a big reverse is underway: “Ebook rights began as gravy,” Konrath writes. “I can picture a day when the print rights are the gravy, and authors make their living with Ebooks.” (My italics added – it’s another thing I never thought I’d see in my lifetime.)

 

Well, that is moving fast. Maybe too fast, out-of-control fast. We’ve seen this kind of Internet hysteria before.   Everybody gets a new gadget (iPod, iPhone, Kindle) and rushes over to the fun place (iTunes) to buy stuff we absolutely must have (a favorite song from high school!), and a fad is born.

 

It may not be too long before former stick-in-the-mud publishers jam their titles into every imaginable Internet slot, and the resulting glut turns more readers away than invites them in. The bubble bursts, everybody says gee, we’ll never do that again, but then a new gadget is born, and we all rush around trying to make a buck out of that.

 

 

But Are They Any Good?

 

I don’t mean to appear so dazzled by the initiative and optimism of authors like Seth Harwood that I’ve forgotten to ask the question every reviewer and reader wants to know:  Is his writing any good?

 

His first published novel (Three Rivers/Random House), “Jack Wakes Up,” which begins a series of books (Seth’s already written three), is both a refreshing crime novel and a witty look at 21st century existential angst through its title character, a charming wiseacre/former actor/reluctant sleuth named Jack Palms.

 

True, everything about this original paperback looks like a flashy postmodern Chandler spinoff that fans of paperback detective fiction might pick up for a good airplane read, something fun and quick.

 

But that’s just the page-turner part.

 

Had it been published in hardcover like, say, a Chuck Palahniuk novel, the package would have said take this seriously; the author is a worth it. But that’s not what Three Rivers/Random House is saying here.

 

While I’m a big proponent of publishing first novels in original paperback, it’s sad to see a gem like this thrown out to the public without support or even (dare I even wish this) a little creativity. Maybe there’s no budget or even a person assigned to getting the word out, but I wish at least someone at Random House had spotted the map Seth laid out in creating an audience of 80,000 (see #2 in this series). And this is a primed audience that most certainly wants to be recontacted, wants to create new viral energy and wants to help launch Seth’s second book with inspiration and tweets galore.

 

And look how much they’d have to work with:  While “Jack Wakes Up” touches wonderfully on the full spectrum of  the hardboiled school, ranging from Dashiell Hammett and Mickey Spillane to James Cain and Robert Parker, it’s also a meditation, a spoof, a homage and a pretty good action story all at once.

 

 

The Back Story

 

But it’s the hero’s vulnerability and a heckuva back story that win us readers over.

 

Early on we learn that a few years ago, Jack Palms got his big break as an actor by starring in  “Shake ‘Em Down,” a giant Hollywood success of the punch-’em-up variety that has turned cute guys into franchise millionaires like Eddie Murphy in “Beverly Hills Cop,”  Sylvester Stallone in “Rocky” or  Bruce Willis in “Die Hard.”

 

But before he could make the sequel, “Shake It Up,” Jack developed a drug problem, a bad marriage and a tendency to cold-cock the wrong people (like his ex, it’s rumored), at which point he found himself in rehab when he should have been making sequels #2, #3, and #4.

 

So at the start of “Jack Wakes Up,” our almost-hero is back, broke and single. He’s a lot wiser, conscientiously sober, and ready for a comeback if only the studio’s insurance company will cover him.  Waiting for the phone to ring at his classic hillside Sausalito apartment with its terrific view and overdue rent,  Jack is offered a job that throws him headlong into San Francisco’s underworld and face-to-face with one colossal babe named Maxine, and this novel is off and running.

 

Part of the fun for any movie-watching reader is that Jack is still recognizable as a tough-guy movie star whom every hotel clerk, bartender, parking attendant, bouncer or waiter claps on the back,  ushers to the best seat in the house, buys a drink or provides the info tip he needs. Jack knows it’s all phony: If the sequel is never made, he’ll sink into oblivion, and his famous face will turn into has-been land (”Say, weren’t you…”).

 

But the twist is that he doesn’t march around like that smug idiot on “Burn Notice”  trying to recreate the GQ image. His new sobriety and divorce have given him a peace of mind that raises real doubts about going back to the false Hollywood love-you-man bullshit again.

 

So unlike most crime novel heroes, Jack opens the crack in his emotional armor just a tiny bit more with each adventure, and this makes him far more human and intriguing to watch than any of the usual annoying smart-mouthed imitations parading around in “Oceans 11″ remakes.

 

 

It’s the Writing

 

As always,  it is the writing and in this case the observational acuity that makes a novel like this follow us around.

 

We do hear Chandler in the background when a beautiful bartender “gives Jack a look, all eyes and big red lips, that would stop a train.”

 

We do feel that sinister noirism as Jack sees his name on a possible death list and “gets a soft chill up his spine.” But we’re more engaged watching the author play with existential  references when, for example, Jack starts agreeing with a bad guy who’s lying to him and, and, glancing at “the flat surface of his coffee,” Jack notices that his reflection has disappeared.

 

Mini-finesse like that makes  “Jack Wakes Up” more than a hoot, as is “Young Junius,”  Seth’s work-in-progress about a streetwise kid from the projects. But the real treat in Seth’s writing  can be found in short stories (”A Long Way from Disney,” vols 1 and 2) that he seems to be hiding under the covers like a little kid.

 

 

A Writer to Watch

 

One story is about a sad young boy who catches a frog with a butterfly net while his parents are back at the house, arguing. Holding the frog in the net up to eye level, he tells us:  “I could see his toes poking through the holes in the net. His eyes were draped with clear lids that fell and then rose back up slowly.” It’s a brief but vivid moment that foretells everything that happens in the rest of the story and makes you think, hmmmm, here’s a writer to watch.

 

In another,  a couple of stoners bumming around Europe find themselves at Pamploma when the terrified bulls begin slipping and sliding on wet cobblestones, and runners (mostly American) pile up in front of them, getting gored and stomped on without letup.  The narrator, caught in the mess of fear, gore, soul-deep loss (why does anybody go to Pamploma?) looks up for a moment. “Two parallel lines of buildings outlined a strip of grey sky above me,” he muses, “as if something still existed outside of what I saw.” The economy and honesty of that of statement reflects both the narrator’s last spark of hope that life awaits defeat, and perhaps always has.

 

 

A Wild Goose Chase?

 

After reading his short fiction, much of which has appeared in a number of literary journals, I began thinking of Seth as a serious writer who may be — well, not off on a wild goose chase but not sitting in a quiet room writing more serious fiction, either. He is a graduate of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop and was taught by Marylynne Robison and Denis Johnson. There is a tenderness that sneaks out of his short stories and tugs at the heart so much you want him to stop doing anything commercial except write.

 

But Seth got an agent and a publisher for “Jack Wakes Up” and he’s determined to “grow” the series. Right now that’s too bad, because the publisher won’t let him continue to give the book away as a full pdf, as he did when he first built his audience, won’t let him sell the book on his own through iPhone apps or eBook readers, never helped him with an independent bookstore tour (he set it up and They are letting him give away the first three chapters of the novel free here and the entire book is still free as a serialized audiobook podcast here, but this feels awfully back-handed paid. That awful self-fulfilling prophecy is on its way: If returns come back, promising-but-not-enough sales for #1 will convince the publisher he doesn’t have enough of a “platform” for #2 or #3 in the series.

 

I guess that’s routine these days – as an author, you have to do the marketing work by yourself, and then if the publisher sees your book “taking legs” (walking out of the stores by itself), you might get a new contract. I never saw this kind of pressure on, say,  Sue Grafton, Robert Parker or Patricia Cornwell. They would never would have gotten past book #1 if their publishers hadn’t stayed in for the fight. And they were pre-Internet: no ready-to-go readership of 80,000 waiting out there, as Seth has.

 

 

The True Believer

 

But Seth is a true believer. He can’t help believing that young Internet adepts like himself  can help the publishing industry change so profoundly and so quickly that our tragic era of flat sales and increasing costs will come to an end. He asks – and the new breed of angry young writer is not going to stop asking — why publishers are dragging their heels so badly when it comes to the simplest things, like going after iPhone apps aggressively or using podcasts as free publicity, or reducing the price of Ebooks to reflect reduced costs (in paper/printing/binding/shipping).

 

And other true believers are out there doing that work for publishers. Remember the old “open source” movement that encouraged everybody to share what they knew on the Internet so we could all benefit? That’s a basis for author marketing. When you share your art, and people like it, they want to help spread the word.

 

“Thanks for spreading the word, and thanks for listening,” says Erin O’Briant on every episode (there are seven) of “Glitter Girl,” her funny lezbo-garageband novel,  which she recorded from deep inside a closet (fabric absorbs echo) and gives away as a podcast on iTunes, where readers can leave reviews.J.C. Hutchins

 

“I’ve built my reputation on giving away high-quality stories in podcast form,” write thriller novelist J.C. Hutchins in Fast Company. “To keep my current fan base fat and happy, I need to keep tending that farm. Fat and happy fans are evangelical fans.”

 

And that’s the point I think mainstream publishers don’t get. In their need to control every facet of the publishing process, they can’t believe authors are already so much farther ahead of the marketing game, and so much more powerful.

 

Author Jesse Kornbluth even wrote in  Publishers Weekly that publishers should just give up what they do badly, “attach $5,000 to $10,000 to the advance” and let the author use that money “for digital marketing expenses and Website enhancement.”

 

It’s such a wonder: All these questions are going to be answered sooner or later, maybe by unpublished writers who happen to reach home plate first.

Traditional Publishing, Self Publishing, and Vanity Presses: My Take On Things

This post, from S.L. Armstrong, originally appeared on her blog on 11/28/09 and is reprinted here in its entirety with her permission.

The announcement last week by Harlequin regarding their partnership with Author Solutions, Inc. (owner of iUniverse and exLibris) to create a new imprint called Horizons has thrown a new log onto an old controversy: the highly charged debate between traditionally published authors and their self-published counterparts. You see, Horizons is intended to be a “self-publishing” arm of Harlequin’s company, and the virtual uproar has sent digital shockwaves through the internet.

But the disagreement isn’t over Harlequin’s decision. Blog entries from both sides are decidedly negative regarding this move, because of the clumsy way Harlequin has gone about it, specifically, their intent to steer rejected authors to their pay-for-play method, and their implication that sufficiently successful titles in this line could be picked up on contract by other Harlequin imprints. (Outcry from the Romance, Mystery, and Science Fiction Writers Associations over this has since prompted Harlequin to remove their name from the line — they’ve rechristened it DellArte Press.) Instead, the announcement has merely been the catalyst in renewing the ongoing argument between the two differing publishing models.

You may have noticed I put “self-publishing” in quotes above. This is because, interestingly enough, what has reignited the war of words between traditionally published authors and self-published authors is a business model that is neither one. DellArte Press, like the other services owned by Author Solutions, belong to a third category called vanity publishing. This middle-ground combined the worst aspects of both models, and the benefits of neither. And yet, though both sides agree on this salient point, it nevertheless brings them head-to-head on virtually every other aspect of the industry. The arguments have, as usual, degenerated from discussions on the relative merits of differing business models to disparaging generalizations of self-published authors as talentless hacks and traditionally published authors as cookie-cutter sellouts.

I have made the decision to forego the traditional publishing model in favor of the self-publishing one, and I want to take some time to outline why I have chosen this way. But first, I think it’s important that we all get our terms straight, because the biggest thing that I have noticed among recent blog entries (particularly those by traditionally published authors) is the tendency to conflate self-publishing with vanity publishing. Whether this is intentional or accidental, I can’t say, but I think it’s time the distinction is laid out.

So, What Are We Talking About Here?

When we talk about the “traditional” publishing model, what we’re talking about is the process by which an aspiring author submits their manuscript to various agents, negotiating the sea of rejection letters until one agent agrees to represent the writer. That agent then shops out the manuscript to various large publishing houses until one of them agrees to purchase the rights for the book. The writer is given a contract, possibly an advance on future royalties, and the book — after revisions by editors working for the publishing house — is printed in large numbers and made available to major booksellers around the country.

By contrast, a “self” publishing model removes both the agent and the publishing house, allowing the author to work directly with the printer to have their book printed. I’ll go into more detail regarding the benefits and drawbacks of this method through the course of this entry, but it’s easy to see at the very least that this is, in many ways, an “easier” path to publication than the traditional model.

In between these two is the “vanity” model. A vanity publisher is a company between the author and the printer that facilitates (for an often substantial fee) the relationship between those two entities. Vanity publishers generally offer many of the same services of a traditional publishing house, e.g., editing services or cover art design, but only if the author purchases them for additional fees beyond their initial investment for the publishing of the book itself. This is the model that Author Solutions uses for all of its subsidiary companies, DellArte Press included.

Further confusing matters, there is the term “small press” or “independent press”. For most intents and purposes, these companies are the same as the traditional model, but the exact line that distinguishes them from a large publishing house is less than clear, especially given that many of these independent presses began as businesses intended only to self-publish the works of those who started them.

Finally, there seems to be some distinction being made in some recent blog entries between the term “published” and the term “printed”, specifically the statement that self-published books aren’t “published”, just “printed”. As I don’t understand what is meant by separating the two terms, and the blog entry in question failed to elaborate, I will be using them interchangeably.

Self-Publishing Objections — Overruled

Now that I’ve set down the terminology as I understand it, and how I’ll be using it, what I want to do is examine some of the most repeated objections that traditionally published authors have given recently when coming down against self-publishers and offer rebuttals to demonstrate the conflation of self and vanity publishing that I have noticed.

First of all is the statement that if an aspiring author doesn’t get a string of rejection letters, they have no impetus to improve their writing, and therefore, the work they produce is of inferior quality. Setting aside the simple fact that the average rejection letter is a generic form letter that offers no suggestions for improvement, the implication of this statement is that being rejected by agents is the only way to know that one’s writing could use work. This ignores the existence of writing workshops and critique groups, which many authors on both sides of the debate are members of.

I won’t deny that there are plenty of non-traditionally published works that are of a significantly less polished quality than others, but I suspect that the vast majority of those are coming out of vanity presses and not true self-publishers. My reasoning for this is that a self-published author has more invested in the work — business license, purchasing and registering ISBNs, etc — and, as a result, is less likely to be satisfied with a book that is not of high quality than perhaps a vanity published author who does not have to put in the additional overhead just to get a book in print.

Following from the idea that non-traditionally published books are lower quality is the oft-quoted statistic from traditionally published authors that “self-published books on average sell only x books”, where ‘x’ varies between 75 and 200 depending on how vehemently the author is speaking against self-publishing. I’ve done some research on this and have traced the source of this number back to an article that cites sales figures from iUniverse for 2005. Not only is this several years old, during which time the self-publishing industry has grown by orders of magnitude, but iUniverse is a vanity publisher, and so the numbers are completely meaningless when discussing self publishing. A true self publisher is a separate business entity, not affliated with an existing press, so it’s impossible to get any true sense of those numbers by polling vanity presses.

And the number isn’t really representative even when talking about vanity presses, either. The assumption from the traditional side is that anyone who publishes wants to sell huge numbers of books, and in vanity publishing, that’s not necessarily the case. Someone who wants to collect the faded handwritten recipes from their grandmother into a more permanent form that they can pass down the family is not trying to become a best-selling author, but the quoted statistic uses that single printing to bring down the average of those who are trying to have a modest career in writing. The reported sales also don’t take into account author-bought copies, so an author who purchases 200 copies of their book and sells them by hand through a personal website or at a convention doesn’t have those 200 copies added into the reported sales figures, but the books aren’t any less sold. But I digress.

The next most popular objection to self-publishing by traditional authors is that self-publishers don’t have the agreements with booksellers that big publishing houses do, so a self-published author won’t see their book on the shelf. And this is both absolutely true, and completely meaningless. With a large portion of book sales being done through online retailers like Amazon, seeing a book on a shelf isn’t the only way to find it anymore. Besides which, the online sales market has prompted cutbacks in many brick-and-mortar stores, causing them to reduce their inventory. As a result, many midlist authors aren’t likely to have their books shelved either.

Now, when called on these objections, many traditionally published authors — at least, of late — have responded with a statement that they are only trying to protect aspiring writers from being taken advantage of by an unscrupulous business model. Granted, this could be a valid concern when talking about vanity publishing. The marketing pitch from those companies is designed to make their products seem attractive, just the same as the marketing pitch for any other product or service that exists. Including traditional publishing houses.

But an informed consumer weighs the pros and cons of all options. It’s not the place of these other authors to insert themselves into the process. If an author wants to rush into a choice without doing research, then they have that right. Same as if they want to buy a timeshare, invest in penny stocks, or put their trust in holistic medicine. And this is the reason why using this argument against self-publishing is useless. Because true self-publishers who have had to go through all the trouble of setting things up for themselves have clearly done their research and decided on this as the best option for them. This isn’t something you can simply stumble into, or something that one can enter into blindly because of some marketing pitch on a website somewhere. Traditional publishing, on the other hand, is based on a business model that moves the nuts and bolts of the decision-making out of the hands of the author themselves and into the agent’s, leaving more than one traditionally published author in the dark about exactly how their royalties are calcuated, the fine print regarding which copyrights they have and don’t have, and a thousand other little provisos in their contracts that were negotiated for on their behalf by someone who wants a piece of the pie as well.

Then, finally, with other avenues exhausted and the debate progressing beyond polite conversation, some traditionally published authors will fall back on the personal attack: “Self published authors aren’t real writers anyway. If they were, they could get signed with a publisher like I did.” Now, ordinarily, this sort of blatant ad hominem doesn’t require a response, but I want to examine it a moment anyway. I’m not a follower of the music industry, but from my outsider point of view, I don’t recall ever hearing musicians signed to large labels disparaging independent artists as not “real” musicians. Nor do small business owners generally take flack from larger ones about being too “talentless” to work for a bigger company. So why would a traditionally published author want to use that sort of argument? I have my pet theories, but anything I list here will end up with me being flamed into a cinder by authors denying it and pointing out my obvious bias, so I won’t elaborate. Suffice it to say that I don’t buy this any more than I buy any of the other objections thus far.

Editors At The Gate

In response to the uproar against self publishing (which, as I’ve noted, is more an uproar against vanity publishing), those self-publishers have pointed out several flaws they perceive in the traditional publishing model. And while authors who choose that route, or the ones who have weighed in recently, clearly feel that the benefits overshadow the flaws, I feel it’s important to point those flaws out as well.

First of all is what has been called the “Gatekeeper Mentality”. This is the idea that a small number of individuals are in control of what makes it to the masses. In this case, that small number is the agents and editors. Traditionally published authors say that this helps the industry by weeding out the undesirables and ensuring only quality works make it out to the bookstores. However, my main objection to this is that publishers don’t pick books that they think people will like, they pick books that they think they can make a profit on. A publishing house is a business, and that means they’re concerned with the bottom line. There are plenty of examples of agents and publishers turning down perfectly good and enjoyable books because they didn’t believe they could make a profit selling them. That’s not ensuring quality; that’s padding their bottom line.

It makes publishers hesitant to take risks or branch out into areas that aren’t already established markets, and agents hesitant to represent authors that write books outside of “acceptable” subject matters that are proven money makers. That’s not to say that there aren’t agents and editors who won’t ever take a chance on something new, but they are rare. And if such a risky book does do a decent bit of business, you can guarantee that the next year, there’ll be thirty different derivatives of that theme on the shelf until the market is flooded. Meanwhile, tons of good books languish in slush piles and rejection bins because they aren’t part of the current hot trend. It doesn’t mean they aren’t quality or that they won’t sell, just that they may not sell as well, so they are passed over in favor of something more profitable.

Publishers don’t put out books as a public service. They do it because they want to make money. And they make a lot of money, especially when compared to the author whose work they’re publishing. With author royalties averaging between 6-8 percent of the net profit, and agents taking away a further 15 percent of that, it can take two to three years for most midlist authors to earn back their advance — if they ever do. The publisher, on the other hand, is netting 10-15 times as much as the author, and for what? Midlist authors, even those who have been around for a few years, rarely get any significant amount of the publisher’s promotion budget. Bookstores won’t make the investment in shelf space for an untried author either, so the author is left having to do the work of promoting their book themselves through conventions, websites, and blogs. And yet, even after doing the majority of the work, they still only get the barest percentage of the profit.

Which is not to say that the publishers do nothing. It’s just that the things they do, more often than not, are designed to remove all creative control from the author. Most authors, especially starting out, get no say in their cover art, internal layout, back-of-the-book blurb, or anything else to do with the physical look and feel of the book. Editors employed by the publisher get the final say on cuts and content to be certain that nothing that could hurt their sales might make it through to print. And since only something considered profitable would make it to this point anyway, an author trying to make it in the traditional world doesn’t even have full control over their subject, having to write “what will sell” instead of what they want to write if they expect to keep their contracts current and those advances coming.

“Some Books Don’t Deserve To Be Published”

So, given all that the publisher takes away from the author in terms of control and money, why do the authors continue to throw themselves at the feet of the publishers? From what I’ve seen in the recent spate of blog entries, I have to say it’s because of the sense of elitism that the publishers manage to foster in the authors. By creating this gatekeeper model, they are saying to the author that they are somehow “better” than the scores of aspiring writers that were passed over. And though to the publisher “better” means “more profitable for us”, the authors themselves seem to get a different message and think this means they are simply better and have the right to push their ideas on others.

Ideas like the one starting this section, which I have seen verbatim in a recent blog entry by a traditionally published author, are what I’m talking about. And that single word ‘deserve’ is what gives me pause. Some books are badly written, with poor grammar and spelling. Some have wooden, one-dimensional characters or confusing and unengaging plotlines. Some have subject matter some might consider offensive or simply in poor taste. And there are examples of every one of them sitting on a bookstore shelf somewhere right now. Agents and publishers aren’t in the business of deciding what “deserves” to be published. That’s more the purview of totalitarian regimes and goverment-run media conglomerates. Publishers want to make money, and they select books and authors that will make them money. That is their only criterion. Money, not merit.

And speaking of money, it’s not the only reason people write. A lot of the criticism levelled at self-publishers by traditionally published authors has to do with statements to the effect of “you’ll never make any money that way” or “authors don’t pay, they get paid”. To the second statement, I say if giving over 90 percent of your profits to someone else doesn’t count as paying, I don’t know what does. But as far as the first, it’s important to understand that not everyone has the same goals. Like many small business owners, self publishers generally have no aspirations to become millionaire success stories. They just want to do something they love, share it with the world, and if they can make a modest living at it, that’s a bonus. Self publishing gives them the freedom to write what they want without contractual restrictions or fear of being dropped for being less than stellarly successful, and it allows them to cater to readers that are otherwise not served by what the large houses are pushing out.

The existence of these untapped niche markets is another reason why the traditional publishing model shouldn’t be the only game in town. Because there are people out there who don’t want to read twenty variations of the same story just because it’s popular this month. And no amount of having traditionally published authors pointing at the New York Times Bestseller List is going to change that. Yes, some people will buy what’s available, and some of those books will be bought more often. But that doesn’t provide proof that there isn’t a market for something new anymore than the existence of the Billboard charts means there’s no place for the independent artist. Besides which, bestseller lists, particularly high profile ones like the NYT, are often self-perpetuating. A moderately successful book makes it onto the list, and then many people who wouldn’t have looked at it otherwise buy it only because it’s on a bestseller list, thereby boosting the numbers and pushing it further up the list. It says nothing about how “good” or “enjoyable” a book is, only that it’s been bought a large number of times. It’s entirely possible that a majority of the people who bought the book read it and hated it, but that’s not reflected in the bestseller list because its concern stops at the point of sale.

Lastly, it’s worth noting that on more than one occasion, the same authors putting down self-publishing in the most vehement terms will — often in the same blog entry — announce that self-publishing is “okay for some things” and even add that they “may consider self publishing a future project”. Which just sounds to me like the publishing equivalent of “See? I’m not homophobic; I have a gay friend!” Considering that the “some things” that they allow that self-publishing is “okay” for are usually non-fiction such as memoirs, diaries, or hobby books (for which model trains are for some reason given very frequently as an example), it’s more of a “you stay over there, and I’ll stay over here, and we’ll get along fine” attitude. In other words, things that don’t compete with the fiction that they write are fine, as though reading were a zero-sum game and any self-published book bought means one less book they’re capable of selling.

Can’t We All Get Along?

Self-publishing isn’t a threat to traditional publishing. But in a world where people can call in and vote for who should be the next big thing in music, a guy making Twitter posts of amusing shit his dad says can get a TV deal with CBS, and a chubby kid swinging a toy lightsaber can get a golden ticket to internet infamy, there is a growing culture of democratised entertainment. Rather than being forced to rely on the opinions of a few key people at the top of the industries as to what will line their already swollen wallets that much further, more and more people are beginning to feel that they — as the consumers of the media — should be the ones to decide what is good or not. And the only way that can happen is if they have the access to make the choices themselves without the interference of a profiteering gatekeeper.

Self-publishing and vanity publishing are two growing options to bring new content to people looking to discover the latest secret and be the ones who bring it to their friends. These are the people who relentlessly follow the new underground band from club to club, telling all their friends about them, helping to grow the fan base, and then abandoning them when they’re signed to a big label because they got so popular as to be noticed. In short, not everyone wants to be told what they’re supposed to like just because “everybody” liked it last week.

But, of course, some people do. And there’s room in the world for both.

And just to be clear, since some of these traditionally published authors claim that no self-publishers are saying it: I do not condone what Harlequin did, nor am I a proponent of vanity publishing in general. However, neither do I condemn the practice because if people want to throw money away into unscrupulous business models, they have that right. If they didn’t, Ron Popeil would be bankrupt right now.

Tomorrow there will be another, much shorter, post about vanity and self publishing, but I’ve been working on this for four days now and I need to set it aside now.

100 Open Courses to Take Your Writing to the Next Level

This article, from Suzane Smith, originally appeared on the Online University Reviews site in November of 2009.

Whether you are in high school, a graduate student, or a professional writer, there is [lots] of help on the web for your writing. [Communication is] an essential part to any career, everyone from journalists to managers to politicians needs to have an impressive [command of] prose. Those low on funds will find a wide array of tools to take their writing to the next level with these 100 open courses [offered by] everyone from leading universities to private companies.

MIT Undergraduate Open Courses To Take Your Writing To The Next Level

Start your free education off right by taking the same writing classes as the undergraduates of this leading Ivy League school.

  1. The Nature of Creativity : Get your writing to the next level by getting your creative juices flowing with this open course. It is an introduction to problems about creativity as it pervades human experience and behavior.
     
  2. Writing About Literature : Up your writing skills by writing about famous works of literature, poetry, and more. Goals of the course include increasing students skills in reading, knowing a single writer deeply, and encouraging independent decisions.
     
  3. New Media Literacies : Study literacy theory through media context in this course from ancient Greece to the present. Readings include Plato, Graff, Brandt, Heath, Lemke, Gee, Alvermann, Jenkins, Hobbs, Pratt, and Lankshear and Knobel.
     
  4. Shakespeare, Film and Media : A master of writing, study Shakespeare on film with this open course. Most of the work will involve analysis of the film text, aided by videotape, DVD, the Shakespeare Electronic Archive.
     
  5. Media in Cultural Context: Popular Readerships : This course will introduce students to the history of popular reading and to controversies about taste and gender that have characterized its development. Learn how to write for both men and women, different tastes, and more by taking this open course.
     
  6. International Women’s Voices : Learn how to take your writing to the next level by studying these leading women in history. Contemporary women writers studied will be from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, and North America.
     
  7. The Linguistic Study of Bilingualism : If you speak more than one language and want to improve your writing, try this course. It examines the development of bilingualism in human history from Lucy to present day.
     
  8. Expository Writing for Bilingual Students : Similar to the above, this course specifically targets student’s abilities to write in two or more languages. It includes an extensive set of general writing guide handouts, located in the study materials section.
     
  9. Foreign Languages and Literatures : Examine the terms “avant garde” and “Kulturindustrie” in French and German culture of the early twentieth century through this open course. Figures considered include everyone from Adorno to Tzara.
     
  10. Advanced Spanish Conversation and Composition : This course examines perspectives on technology and culture in the language of Spanish. For fluent speakers only, students work on taking both their speaking and writing to the next level.
     
  11. Philosophy in Film and Other Media : See how philosophers have influenced writing and other media with this open course. It examines works of film in relation to thematic issues of philosophical importance that also occur in other arts, particularly literature and opera.
     
  12. The Art of the Probable: Literature and Probability : The objective of this open course is to focus on the formal, thematic, and rhetorical features that imaginative literature shares with texts in the history of probability. These issues include the causes for phenomena that are knowable only in their effects and the question of what it means to think and act rationally in an uncertain world.
     
  13. Technologies of Humanism : This open course explores the properties of narratives as they have evolved from print to digital media. Works covered range from the Talmud, classics of non-linear novels, experimental literature, early sound and film experiments to recent multi-linear and interactive films and games.

Read the rest of the article, which provides information and links for 87 additional free, online courses and seminars in writing, literature, communication, how to use software programs (a big help in the author platform area) and much more, offered by such respected names as MIT, Hewlett Packard, the United States Small Business Administration, Microsoft, Adobe and more, on the Online University Reviews site.

Why Booksellers Must Become Destination Marketing Oriented

What is Destination Marketing?

It is creating your business in such a manner that people want to come to it to have fun and be entertained. Whole downtowns can band together to create fun-to -shop places as a theme for their business community. There are plenty of stories about the big box chain bookstores driving the Mom and Pop bookstores out of business. How can the little guys compete and survive? By becoming a shopping destination.

My bookstore, The Book Barn, is a small store. It is literally a Mom and Pop operation, since 1979—just my wife and myself. It was 10 years or so ago that we first learned about destination marketing. We began having many more events at our store—author chats & signings and historical events such as The America Girls. We got better at these until we began to win national and State Governor awards for our events. More importantly, the word of mouth started getting around. The Book Barn was an interesting and fun place to be. Despite the economy, the price of gas, and 3 big box bookstores within 15-20 miles, our business began improving. Just as important, businesses around us began to understand what we were trying to do and started working on their events.

Two plus years ago, we decided to expand the scope of our next Harry Potter release party. It was difficult, but we talked the businesses on our block to work with us to create a Diagon Alley experience. The newspaper printed a special edition of the Daily Prophet and handed them out at the event. We had a HP movie playing outside. Over 2,000 people, many in costume ,came. Click here to see many pictures of people having a very good time. Ask yourself the following questions:

  • If they had a really fun experience in our downtown, would they leave with a good impression?
     
  • Are they more likely to return to shop?
     
  • Are they going to tell others about the fun time they had?

By putting this together and succeeding, the businesses around became more likely to join us in future events and have done so

In addition we have author book chats and signings, music & poetry events, and finally, we have historic events where we talk about a time frame, play & sing music from that time, play games from then, work on art/craft projects centered around the theme, and eat snacks common to the time and culture—a surround sound context. The kids and the parents love it. We ask for food or school supply donations for our local social care organizations

We have a wonderful Yellow Lab, Tucker, who greets everybody and loves up to them. Some bring in their dogs to meet and play with Tucker. We have had both dog and cat theme events featuring animal books and activities. We ask for treat and food donations for the animal shelter and the new dog park the city is building.

Do you see a pattern here?

We want people to see our store as a happy, happening place. We are not alone in this. Look at Rainy Day Books in Kansas City. They have stupendous lecture/signing events in cooperation with the Unity Church near their store. They draw huge crowds for national and international-level speakers and authors and sell a lot of books. The Wild Rumpus, a wacky children’s bookstore in Minneapolis, creates a wonderful, child-appealing atmosphere. There are live chickens and rabbits running around the store. In the middle of the mid-level book section, there is a small log cabin. Inside, there is a foot-wide plexiglass covering of a 10′ long trench which is lit up and contains white rats running back and forth under the floor. When you go into the unisex bathroom, watch what happens to the mirror over the sink when the light goes out—whoa, there is a beautiful aquarium filled with colorful tropical fish behind the mirror showing through.

The Bottom Line

For the smaller stores to compete there a number of things they can do; however, becoming a destination for people who want to come there is absolutely critical. The same can be said for websites. Make them interesting and fun to come to. People tend to share two things with their friends: great experiences and terrible experiences. Be sure you’re in the first category. Providing a good time while giving great service is essential.

 

This is a cross-posting from Bob Spear’s Book Trends blog.

.

100 Free Lectures That Will Make You a Better Writer

This article, from Caitlin Smith, originally appeared on the Online Universities Blog on March 9, 2009.

Being a writer means you constantly evolve and grow in your writing knowledge. One way to aid in this evolution to becoming a better writer is by learning from what others have to offer. The following lectures cover a wide range of fields including literature, speeches from current writers, lectures from Nobel Laureates in literature, lectures about fiction, non-fiction, poetry, journalism, and even entire classes on writing.

Learn from Great Literature

These lectures focus on specific writers and their works, frequently with an emphasis and analysis on the writing.

  1. Richard Wright, Black Boy. Professor Amy Hungerford takes a look at this American novel and also explores the writer’s determination to maintain the integrity of his novel in the face of a Book of the Month Club president.
     
  2. Flannery O’Connor, Wise Blood. The first part of this two-part lecture series discusses faith and interpretation while the second part examines the novel in several different contexts.
     
  3. Milton. Professor John Rogers teaches this class from Yale with lectures on a variety of Milton’s works, especially Paradise Lost.
     
  4. Modern Poetry. From Robert Frost to T.S. Eliot to Elizabeth Bishop, learn from modern poets in these lectures given by Professor Langdon Hammer at Yale.
     
  5. J.D. Salinger, Franny and Zooey. Learn to use evidence from the text to make a sound argument with this novel as an example.
     
  6. Guest Lecture by Andrew Goldstone. This lecture focuses on Vladimir Nabokov’s writing style in relation to other modern writers.
     
  7. John Barth, Lost in the Funhouse. Watch this lecture to find out about Barth’s commitment to language expressed in the risks he takes as a writer and how it accentuates the relationship of language and love.
     
  8. Thomas Pynchon, The Crying Lot of 49. Amy Hungerford looks at Pynchon’s work as "a sincere call for connection, and a lament for loss, as much as it is an ironic, playful puzzle."
     
  9. Toni Morrison, The Bluest Eye. Examine the role that language as violence plays in Morrison’s work.
     
  10. English 205: Lectures. Read the lectures from this class at Los Angeles Harbor College that covers English literature up to 1800.

Read the rest of the article, which includes links to lectures #11 – 100, under the headings Learn From Current Writers, Learn From Nobel Winners, Fiction Writing, Nonfiction Writing, Poetry, Miscellaneous Classes, University Classes Teaching Writing, and Journalism, on the Online Universities Blog.

November Novel Writing Month

Na No Wri Mo Sounds like words to an African tribal dance if I didn’t know better. In 2007, I read about this National Novel Writing Month contest which takes place in November. This contest has been happening since 1999. Thanks to the internet the amount of contestants, called NaNoers, went from 21 in 1999 to 94,000 in 2007.

This year I decided to check into the details. The contest is free to enter. At the end of the month I would have to have fifty thousand words to finish in the contest. Then in December the novel can be edited and polished. A winner is picked from the entries. There is a list of writers that have had a novel published after entering it in this contest.

From what I read the authors are winging their story. They aren’t expected to know where the novel is going, but every day just pick up where they left off. Don’t worry about a chapter by chapter plot synopsis or an outline. This approach to writing is not new to me. It’s the way I approached all my books. The secret is in going back to rework the story, edit and polish it into a work you can be proud to have your name on.

On a whim I entered the 6th of November. So I was already five days behind which worried me. I tried to tell myself two thousands words a day doesn’t sound like a lot for me. Once I made up for those six days that is, fifty thousand words should be no problem. Little did I know that this would be one of those months when I would be gone at least half of the thirty days. Little things have gotten in the way of my writing a novel like a wedding, book signing, dental visits and now Thanksgiving.

Several November days, I spent most of the afternoon emailing libraries in Iowa, Missouri and Pennsylvania to let them know about my two Amish books listed in Ingram Distribution Catalog. In the email I mentioned that I had an online bookstore that all my books can be purchased from, thinking that libraries could go to the website to look at the books. Maybe even buy books from my site.

Quite an undertaking to do that many emails when I realized how many libraries there were in each state. Made me glad for copy and paste. For Iowa, I mentioned that I lived here. As for Missouri, I had emailed the libraries last year when I published my Civil War book which is a fact/fiction book based in Vernon County, Missouri. Maybe they will remember me. Maybe not. I’ve been told many emails about new books target libraries. As for Pennsylvania, residents buy my Amish books more than any other state. One theme that was on most library sites in that state was the fact state funding had been cut for libraries which meant their budgets had to be reduced. This didn’t sound like a good time to be advertising books for sale, but my self published, paperback books are inexpensive compared to books from publishers that are sold in bookstores. Perhaps, a library’s reduced budget would be a reason to buy my books. Now I wait and see. If I have any luck with these libraries, I still have 48 states to go.

 

There’s something to be said for incentive. Being in the NaNoWriMo contest has given me that. I had the story line all plotted in my head for some time but advertising and starting the new website had kept me from getting started on the book. Now I am well under way. Maybe not far enough along for NaNoWriMo, but looking forward to releasing it sometime next year.

Thanksgiving is upon us. As with many family gatherings, relatives have to travel. We go to Marion to my younger brother’s for lunch. As usual, he has barbecued turkey on the menu. Not such an undertaking the way he does it. The grill is in the garage out of the wind. There’s a thermometer inserted in the turkey that transmit to a sensor in the kitchen so he can watch the rising temperature. Once or twice, my brother runs outside to check briefly just to be on the safe side. The rest of the time he is visiting with us and watching a parade.

For the evening meal, we rush forty miles or so from Marion to Belle Plaine to my husband’s mother’s house for another big meal. Sometimes I think it was a mistake to put Thanksgiving and Christmas so close on the calendar. We no sooner get our appetites back from Thanksgiving and Christmas comes with more food. Come to think of it. We are truly blessed and should count our blessings every day. We have our families close and plenty to eat.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving and travel safe. I’ll be back next Tuesday.

 

 

 

 

 

RWA Wants Associate Members Who Foster Relationships Between Readers and Authors

This post, from Jane L, originally appeared on Dear Author on 11/23/09 and is reprinted here in its entirety with her permission.

I received a letter today from RWA [Ed. note – Romance Writers of America] indicating that I would not be able to renew my membership when it expires at the end of the month. I have posted the letter for you all to read it. While it says that I am a General Member, this is an error that RWA has consistently made. I’ve signed up an associate member for the three years that I have paid my dues. I want to state at the outset there there is absolutely nothing in the letter that is not true except for one thing.

Dear Ms. Litte,

On November 30, 2009 your General membership with Romance Writers of America will expire. We are unable to renew General membership for individuals who have indicated in writing that they are not in serious pursuit of a career in romance writing.

General membership in RWA is open to all persons “seriously pursuing a romance fiction writing career” (Section 4.1.1 RWA Restated Bylaws 2007). On September 11, 2009, you wrote, “I have not written a book nor do I have plans to write a book…” Staff is unable to allow renewal of General membership for individuals who publish statements such as the one cited above.

In most instances, we are able to offer Associate membership to individuals who do not qualify for General membership. However, Associate membership is offered to individuals, “who support the organization and its purposes but do not meet the requirements for General membership” (Section 4.1.2 RWA Restated Bylaws 2007). We have been made aware of numerous posts on your blog and on the “romfail” thread on Twitter that indicate you do not support RWA or romance authors.

This decision is not one that we would have chosen. We feel that authors’ and readers’ interests are closely related and that both have much to gain by a harmonious and mutually beneficial relationship. In light of the evidence on file, RWA is not offering you the option to renew.

It is true that I have publicly stated I have no aspirations to write. (See blog post referenced in letter here). It is also true that I make fun of bad books (or what I consider to be bad books). Examples can be seen here.

It is also true that I have been critical of RWA and its inability to provide its members full information on the panoply of ways that publishing is changing for the membership.

It is also true that I have been critical of authors.

I do find it interesting that the justification for blackballing me from RWA is because my blog posts and #romfail thread on Twitter” indicate that I do not support RWA or romance authors. I have supported RWA but I have also been extremely critical of them. I don’t support romance authors individually, but I do support the romance authors in general; and, of course, I support the romance genre and romance books.

I actually had not planned to renew my membership. I joined because it gave you a discount for the RWA conference and you received the RWR but over the past three years, I’ve read the RWR only a couple of times and I decided that this year I would go to RomCon instead of RWA.

I have had a lot of supportive emails sent to me over this. I hope that none of you jeopardize your own membership or standing or position in RWA or with your fellow authors over this issue because I do not want to be the cause of any more disharmony for authors. And I can apparently still be an RWA member if I choose to publicly state that I am seriously pursuing a writing career.

Anyone who reads this blog will know that RWA’s actions will not change my conviction that true advocacy requires a conversation among many different — often contrary and conflicting — views. I will never believe that bad books are a necessity about which we must remain quiet, nor will I relinquish my critical views of a genre I love and an industry in which I have taken an active interest. Hopefully authors know that whatever they get here at Dear Author is candid, honest, and a product of my faith in good books and the readers who love them.

Jane

 

Jane L. is a long time romance reader whose passion is, you guessed it, reading. She’s currently loving contemporary authors like Sarah Mayberry and Kristan Higgins but her first love will always be the historical. Some of her old time favorites are Amanda Quick and Johanna Lindsey and some of the new favorites are Sherry Thomas, Joanna Bourne and Claudia Dain.

#fridayflash: Angelcake Excerpt

This week, I present an excerpt from Angelcake: a screenplay I wrote and have been working on converting into a novel off and on for years. In the story, following her accidental death, Judy Stringer is pressed into service as an unlikely, otherworldly suicide interventionist. She must prevent three suicides, or spend the equivalent of three lives’ worth of life expectancy as an afterlife public service worker under a literal boss from Hell: a matronly shrew of a demon supervisor nicknamed Attila the Bun.

Sarah, seventeen, slender and pretty, sits on the edge of the tub gazing stupidly at a positive pregnancy test.  She wears a modest sundress and no make up. A low whine escapes from her and she quickly covers her mouth to muffle the noise. Her mother knocks on the door from the outside.

“Sarah honey, come on, it’s time for church.”

“Just a minute, Mom.”

Sarah stuffs the pregnancy test in her handbag, then goes to the sink and splashes some water on her face. She blots her face on a towel and tries to put on a normal expression as she looks at herself in the mirror. She can’t maintain it, her tears return. She opens the medicine cabinet and paws through its contents, looking for prescription drugs. All she finds is a bottle of aspirin. She closes the cabinet, reads the label, and notices Judy materializing behind her. The bottle falls from Sarah’s hand and her face registers awe.

“It won’t kill you,” Judy says, “but it will give you a nasty, bleeding ulcer. And it’s bad for the baby, too.”

Sarah spins around to face Judy and wipes away her tears, her voice halting and hopeful, her eyes glowing. “You know about the baby? Are you…an angel?”

“No, I—“ Judy notes the cross around Sarah’s neck and some religious bric-a-brac around the room. “Not yet, I mean. I’m not officially making with the wings and the harp and all, but I’m in the training program.”

Sarah falls to her knees and clutches at Judy’s dress. “I’ve done such an awful thing…and I’m an awful person!”

Judy pulls Sarah up and they sit on the edge of the tub together. Judy pulls a few sheets of toilet paper off the roll and offers them to Sarah. “And what about the father,” Judy asks. “Didn’t he have a little something to do with this?”

“Well…yes,” Sarah answers, accepting the tissue. “But he wasn’t who I thought he was. He said he loved me!  He said…a lot of things he didn’t mean.”

Judy puts an arm around Sarah’s shoulders and gives them a light squeeze. “I’m sorry, Sarah. I really, truly am. But what’s done is done. There’s no use crying about it and suicide is no solution.”

“But what can I do?! I can’t tell my Mom, she’ll kill me!”

Judy chuckles and waves a hand in the air dismissively. “No she won’t. Kids always think that, but it’s not true. She’ll be mad, sure. And probably disappointed, and worried. But she’s not going to kill you.”

“Are you sure?”

“Absolutely.”

Ten minutes later, Sarah and her mother sit at the small kitchen dinette table in silence. Sarah studies her mother’s stunned, blank face for some clue of how she’s taken the news. Abruptly, her mother pounces at Sarah in a rage, knocking Sarah off her chair and bellowing, “How could you?! What were you thinking?!”

Sarah scrambles into the corner, wedging herself behind the table. “Mama! Calm down!”

“I’ll calm down after I’m done with you!”

She grabs at Sarah’s dress and drags Sarah out from behind the table. Judy materializes between the two, affecting her most beatific expression and holding a hand out in front of her in the stereotypical ‘stop’ gesture.

“Unhandeth the child, O mother of Sarah!”

Sarah’s mother lets go of Sarah’s dress and backs away, into her chair. Sarah retreats to the corner. Judy whispers over her shoulder to Sarah, “You were right about her. My bad.”

Sarah’s mother gasps, “Are you—“

Not waiting for her to finish, Judy announces in her most heavenly-hosty voice, “Behold, I am an angel!” Feeling a little blasphemous, she adds, “More or less.”

Sarah cautiously emerges from behind the table and reaches for her mother’s hand. “Look, Mama!  She’s an angel sent to help us in our time of need and tribulation.”

Sarah’s mother bows her head in deference and fear. Judy puts her arms out to her sides and does her best angel impersonation.

“Verily, I sayeth unto you, that any mother who so…slayeth her daughter…who is with child…eth…” Judy struggles for words, then drops her arms to her sides, sits in the chair next to Sarah’s mother and says, “Look, can we just talk about this?”