The Financial Sanity of Self-Publishing

I would like to point out one very important benefit self publishing has over trad publishing.  I have a NY pubbed friend who has had over 20 books published, but currently only a very few of them are in print.  Unless you are famous, your entire backllist doesn't stay in print, and that is continual lost money. 

When you have 20 books under your belt, and less than 5 of them are currently earning you money, that's not fiscally sound.  In fact, it keeps you on an endless treadmill, especially if you don't break out of the midlist.

Whereas you might have had a repeat customer multiplied many times over . . . with trad publishing, the only option is for many of  your books to be read via used bookstore or library, where you the author, doesn't see a penny.  So who is writing for free here?

Whlie a publishing house has the option of bringing a book back into trade paperback with print-on-demand technology, or ebook, many publishers simply can't be arsed to do it, because they're focused on the big dogs making them money.  If you simply insist on trad publishing, it would behoove you to get something in your contract that insists your books will remain available in print-on-demand format and ebook, and that you'll be compensated fairly for those sales.  Otherwise your average publisher is going to sit on your rights for about seven years while you're not making money.

By contrast, say you're an indie author and you put out one book a year.  In ten years of hard work writing, producing, and marketing your work, you have not just a couple of books in print, but 10 books in print.  If you do it the most fiscally sound way (i.e. Lightning Source for your POD, not Lulu or Authorhouse), then you are making 4-5 times per book what you would from a trad publisher (minus expenses, which you'll hopefully have learned to streamline in a halfway savvy way.)

What this means is...  If I had ten books out, and was selling several hundred copies a month of each of them, I would be making six figures in a year.  Now is it reasonable to expect most self published authors can do this?  No.  Many writers just are not very savvy and never will be.  But is it unreasonable to think this is possible for any self-pubbed author who is both business/marketing savvy and talented?  I don't think it is.

Either way though, I'd rather make a bet on myself and building something that truly belongs to me, rather than make a bet on a publishing house, who could tie up my rights for a very long time, while giving me precious little for it.

When trad publishers rarely have the resources to put a lot of marketing push behind most books, I have to ask myself...in the days of social networking and the internet, is the ego-gratification of being "traditionally vetted",having  a NY editor, and a NY designer really financially worth the expense to me, of losing that much per-book revenue?

For me, the price is too high to trad publish.  Would I change my tune if a big publisher offered me a big contract?  Possibly so, but then the game would be very much changed, wouldn't it?  Your average trad published author isn't "getting" big contracts., nor are many of them getting big contracts over time.  There is a reason seasoned writers lament being stuck on the midlist and keep dreaming of "breaking out."  It's not because big contracts down the road are standard procedure for most authors.

I hear all the time from trad published authors when explaining their pittance of an advance that a writer's career is built over several books.  Yet many of these same writers turn around and attack self-publishing because of what they see as short term cost/benefits.  Why does it make sense to say a trad published author's career is built over several books, but a self-pubbed author's career isn't?

Further, there is nothing in the publishing rulebook that says you can't self-publish some books while seeking trad publication for others.  I believe trad publishing is scared on every level of us.  They'll deny it up and down.  They'll mock us and make jokes...   But this is the author indie movement, much like what has swept through filmmaking and music already.

Be proud of what you are and what you're creating. You'll learn as you go, you'll get better as you go, and you're building equity a trad published author can't hope to touch unless they're famous.

And who wants to lay odds on that one?  Talk about unrealistic expectations.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Seven years? In which universe?

>>>Otherwise your average publisher is going to sit on your rights for about seven years while you're not making money.

Really, where does this figure come from?  Seven years?  Did you take it from the time period for which the law proclaims a missing human being to be dead?

I've been battling A QUARTER OF A CENTURY to have my rights reverted.

And this has been for *non-fiction books that have obsolete content*!

one other thing...

I don't mean to sound flippant about how long your rights have been tied up, but did you not have a clause in your contract about when rights would revert back to you?

In my post I was talking about cases in which that clause was in the contract.  Hope that makes more sense.

MIke...

That's standard on a boiler plate contract last I heard.  I could have misquoted but I'm 99.999% certain that a publisher can sit on your rights doing absolutely nothing with them for seven years unless that's negotiated down to a more sane limit in the contract.  I'm sure it's not the "only" time frame used, but I was given that number by a NY pubbed author who was discussing standard publishing contracts on her blog.

The 7 years may be from the time of publication or it may be 7 years after it goes 'out of print.'  But either way, it's an insane number.  And it may have changed.  I just know last I heard, it was pretty standard.

It makes a lot of sense

I'd suggest that CreateSpace might be a better option than Lightning Source for many authors, especially if they expect a large number of Amazon sales and don't plan on fighting the uphill battle to get their books in a lot of brick and mortar stores.  But aside from that, you make good points.

I'd also suggest that a first time author should realstically budget a good $1000 for up front costs for the first book unless they have some skills that most authors don't have (or they are able to barter).  For instance, you're looking at $200 for ten ISBN #s.  You simply cannot edit your own work, so you need an editor.  You need cover art and VERY few authors can do professional looking cover art.  Finally, there's book layout, which is probably the most learnable skill, so possibly it won't cost anything, but it might if you can't figure it out.  I haven't mentioned software because I've heard that there are freeware packages that can output your pdf with all the formatting Lightning Source requires - however, if you look at Lightning Source's own guidelines they tell you you must use Acrobat Distiller to do it right.

The author planning to self-publish needs to be realistic about these costs and about his/her own ability to do any of these things.  You can be a great marketer, but if you skimp on cover design and editing, it's going to seriously hamper you.

Hey Ed!

Yeah, you're right, CreateSpace is probably better for a lot of authors,especially authors heavily using the Amazon system.  I haven't yet had a chance to order a book through createspace yet to see the quality of the finished product.  But I know Lightning Source's quality. And LSI is going to net you way more than using Lulu or Authorhouse etc.

 

I really need to get in gear and figure out what I want to do there myself.  LSI is still partnered with Amazon to my knowledge, so it's still a good option, especially since with LSI you set the discount you give Amazon.  So you could come out at around the same profit margin as with CS.

 

The rate for ISBN numbers has gone up.  I think it was closer to $400 for 10 when I got mine last fall.

I totally agree with you on cover art.  I did my cover for the novella, but there were reasons for that, and I don't intend to do my own cover art for the print release.  I know what my limits are and cover art isn't one of my talents.

 

And totally agree with you on typography, definitely learnable. 

 

LSI says you must use acrobat distiller because they can't be held responsible for a third party messing things up.  But whatever you use, if you get a proof copy from LSI you can see if what you used was a good idea or not.  I use Open Office for my word processing and they  have a built in PDF creator that's good.  I don't yet know how it meshes with LSI, but I'll try it before I shell out the money for Acrobat Distiller.

 

And totally agreed, I think one of the main problems for indie authors is that people in general cannot judge their own skill level in any given area.  They can look at something someone else did and tell that it's homemade, but not when they do it.  And I'm sure I fall into that trap as well.

to clarify...

I was informed somewhere that ISBN numbers are still $275 for a block of ten, but if you order online the default is $400 for express processing of your order.

 

I looked all over the site at the time of ordering for the original priced block but didn't find it, so it's pretty well hidden, but folks who are getting their own ISBN blocks, contact someone with the contact form if you have to to make sure you get the lowest rate... unless you just need your order processed fast.